« Water in Iraq | Main | Ending World Poverty »

April 11, 2005

United States and South Korea

Interesting news that the US is pulling out a major weapon stockpile from South Korea. The article below says that they 600,000 tons of ammunition. Only Korea and Israel have this weapons reserve program with the U.S. These are mostly likely older weapons intended for a conventional war in case of an invasion from the North and not best-suited for what's likely to flare up there now.

The pullout, I think, is meant to warn Korea against getting too cozy with China. The Korea government has recently spoken of acting as a "balancer" between China and Japan. That's diplomatic language for joining China to restrain Japan. It doesn't have the military or diplomatic clout to literally be a "balancer." South Korea and Japan both have been under the United States' defense umbrella since the end of World War II and have been considered military allies. The U.S. is upset that it's now tilting towards China and pulling some of its troops and weapons out to show the Koreans who's the boss, hoping to get enough of them uneasy to change the government's policy.

So how will this affect what happens with North Korea?

Korea-US Military Alliance Turns Sour
By Jung Sung-ki, Korea Times

The military alliance between South Korea and the United States has shown signs of friction in recent months, affected by a series of developments between the two allies.

The Defense Ministry last Friday revealed a document from Washington a year ago that notified Seoul of its decision to end its war reserve stocks program, called the War Reserve Stocks Allies (WRSA), until 2006.

Under the WRSA program, Washington has maintained about 600,000 tons of ammunition worth 5 trillion won ($4.9 billion) here in preparation for a possible war on the peninsula since 1982, ministry officials said. This accounts for about 60 percent of the ammunition needed for 60 days in an emergency.

The U.S. finances the program, while South Korea has contributed about 70 billion won annually to manage the stockpile. With the termination of the program, Seoul is likely to have to spend some 1 trillion won to get what it needs, the officials said. A bill over the program's termination is now pending in the U.S. Congress.

In a letter to former Defense Minister Cho Young-gil dated May 21, 2004, former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz said the U.S. government will terminate the war reserve stocks program by 2006. The Critical Requirements Deficiency List program, including bombs and equipment needed within the first 30 days after the outbreak of a war, already suspended last year, according to the letter.

The government, however, denied speculation that the U.S.' plan to dump its preposition supplies here might be an expression of Washington's discontent at Seoul, regarding the negotiations of defense costs to cut the country's share and the ``balancer" policy.

``The termination of the WRSA program has been going on at global level,'' ministry spokesman Shin Hyun-don said in a press briefing. ``The U.S. first notified us of the issue in 2000, long before the so-called balancer policy emerged.''

The WRSA programs with the Philippines, Taiwan and Thailand ended before 2002, he said. South Korea and Israel only maintain the programs.

In a move toward building an independent defense system, the ministry said Monday that it is considering procuring 1,000 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) bombs. The plan aims to enhance independent deterrent capabilities against some 3,000 long-range artilleries deployed near the Demilitarized Zone by the North.

The JDAM, dubbed ``smart bombs,'' are cutting-edge missiles guided by global positioning satellite technology. With the JDAM kits, South Korea's military force would be able to carry out a surgical strike, accurately destroying North Korea's artillery capabilities, the officials said.

South Korea's 'balancer' policy attacked
By Choe Sang-Hun, International Herald Tribune
Saturday, April 9, 2005

SEOUL South Korea's main opposition leader on Friday berated a government's policy of seeking a balancing role in Northeast Asia, saying it would damage the country's alliance with the United States.

President Roh Moo Hyun of South Korea recently stressed that his government would play a "balancer's role" in the region. Speaking at a military academy in mid-March, he said: "The map of power in Northeast Asia could shift, depending on what choice we make."

Government officials said Roh's comments reflected South Korea's desire to help control the increasing friction between China and Japan, both suspected of aspiring to regional dominance amid rising nationalism in both countries.

A high-ranking government official rejected the charge, saying Roh's policy was primarily designed to help stop a possible arms race between China and Japan. But he said South Korea also does not want Washington to create military tension with China.

"The alliance between South Korea and the United State is a healthy one," said the official, who refused to be named.

The official acknowledged that "One possible scenario we can imagine in which our policy of playing a balancing role gets in conflict with our alliance with the United States is when Washington considers China a threat and engages in a confrontation with China by helping Japan build up its arms."

Posted by mrl at April 11, 2005 09:12 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://csua.berkeley.edu/~mrl/mt/mt-tb.cgi/14

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference United States and South Korea:

» testanchor759 from testanchor301
testcomment563 [Read More]

Tracked on November 19, 2005 01:35 AM

» testanchor729 from testanchor785
testcomment482 [Read More]

Tracked on November 19, 2005 01:35 AM

» testanchor984 from testanchor193
testcomment966 [Read More]

Tracked on November 19, 2005 01:35 AM

» testanchor233 from testanchor174
testcomment125 [Read More]

Tracked on November 19, 2005 01:35 AM

» testanchor210 from testanchor849
testcomment257 [Read More]

Tracked on November 19, 2005 01:35 AM

» testanchor927 from testanchor978
testcomment212 [Read More]

Tracked on November 19, 2005 01:36 AM

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?