« Suicide Attackers Strike at Kashmiri Peace Bus | Main | Ian McEwan on Saul Bellow's Passing »

April 07, 2005

Papal Infallibility, Liberalism, and Attendance

Thomas Cahill, the author of "How the Irish Saved Civilization" and "Pope John XXIII" has an op-ed in the New York Times today about papal infallibility. He tells an interest story about how the doctrine came about:

John Paul II has been almost the polar opposite of John XXIII, who dragged Catholicism to confront 20th-century realities after the regressive policies of Pius IX, who imposed the peculiar doctrine of papal infallibility on the First Vatican Council in 1870, and after the reign of terror inflicted by Pius X on Catholic theologians in the opening decades of the 20th century. Unfortunately, this pope was much closer to the traditions of Pius IX and Pius X than to his namesakes. Instead of mitigating the absurdities of Vatican I's novel declaration of papal infallibility, a declaration that stemmed almost wholly from Pius IX's paranoia about the evils ranged against him in the modern world, John Paul II tried to further it. In seeking to impose conformity of thought, he summoned prominent theologians like Hans Kung, Edward Schillebeeckx and Leonardo Boff to star chamber inquiries and had his grand inquisitor, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, issue condemnations of their work.
But John Paul II's most lasting legacy to Catholicism will come from the episcopal appointments he made. In order to have been named a bishop, a priest must have been seen to be absolutely opposed to masturbation, premarital sex, birth control (including condoms used to prevent the spread of AIDS), abortion, divorce, homosexual relations, married priests, female priests and any hint of Marxism. It is nearly impossible to find men who subscribe wholeheartedly to this entire catalogue of certitudes; as a result the ranks of the episcopate are filled with mindless sycophants and intellectual incompetents. The good priests have been passed over; and not a few, in their growing frustration as the pontificate of John Paul II stretched on, left the priesthood to seek fulfillment elsewhere.

The situation is dire. Anyone can walk into a Catholic church on a Sunday and see pews, once filled to bursting, now sparsely populated with gray heads. And there is no other solution for the church but to begin again, as if it were the church of the catacombs, an oddball minority sect in a world of casual cruelty and unbending empire that gathered adherents because it was so unlike the surrounding society.

I think Cahill is too optimistic that a more liberal Catholic Church will draw more young people into the pews. All mainline Christian churches in the United States have had this demographic problem, including the liberal Episcopalian Church which has recently elected Gene Robinson, an openly gay man, as a bishop. It's the evangelical churches with conservative religious doctrines, but with more flamboyant rock 'n roll atmospherics, that have been gaining in youth memberships. Maybe they are going the way of Christian churches in Europe. You see that clearly on the college campuses. Conservatives obviously tend to be more religious than liberals. The fact that conservatives tend have more babies at an earlier age than liberals is probably exacerbating that demographic trend.

See the findings of this survey, for example:
Church Trends, 2000
The broad picture of interdenominational attendance, giving, member involvement and more

Of the 1,000 people surveyed by Barna, four out of every 10 said they attend a church service on a typical Sunday. Though this figure is down from last year, it remains relatively unchanged since 1994. The least likely group to attend services is the Baby Busters (18 to 34) at 28%, compared with 51% of adults 55 or older. And while the attendance among men remains unchanged, female attendance has declined in recent years.

Overall, however, women are still more likely to attend church regularly than men.

Politically, conservatives were almost twice as likely as liberals (53% vs. 28%) to attend service every week. And regionally, the "Bible belt" areas of the South and Midwest still attract higher attendance than in the Northeast and West. Attendance averages proved higher among black churches--at 100 per service--than among white congregations (85), and suburban churches were the largest of all at 120 people per service. The smallest attendance was found in rural churches, with urban churches falling somewhere in between at 100.

Posted by mrl at April 7, 2005 06:33 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://csua.berkeley.edu/~mrl/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Papal Infallibility, Liberalism, and Attendance:

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?